科学学研究
 首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿须知  |  广告服务  |  联系我们
科学学研究  2018, Vol. 36 Issue (9): 1610-1614    DOI:
科技管理与知识管理 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
科研项目承担单位信用内涵及形成机理研究
肖小溪,李晓轩
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Studies on Connotation and Mechanism of Organizational Credits for Research Program Performers: from the Perspective of Contractual Relationship
 全文: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB)  输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 科技界的信用管理是近年来我国科研管理的一个重要趋势,对科研项目承担单位进行信用管理更是国家政策的最新要求。要支撑相关政策的落实,该研究聚焦于“科研项目承担单位的信用”这一概念的内涵和形成机理。通过契约关系的视角,明确了科研项目资助机构和承担单位之间的契约关系是科研项目承担单位信用的基础,且契约的不完全性决定了信用的不完全性。进一步从动态博弈模型出发,构建了科研项目承担单位信用的基本模型,揭示了信用形成的机理。最后,结合我国实际,提出了该研究对未来相关政策制定的启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
肖小溪 李晓轩
关键词:   
Abstract: Credit management has been an important trends in science and technology policy and management in recent years, and management on organizational credits for research program performers is actually a new requirement on national level. To support the relevant policies, the focus of this article is the connotation and mechanism of the concept of “organizational credits”. From the perspective of contractual relationship, it is demonstrated that contractual relationship between research program performers and funding agencies is the basis for the former’s organizational credit, and the imperfection of contract actually determines the imperfection of credit. Then the basic model of organizational credit is constructed to illustrate the form mechanism of credit. Finally, combined with facts and situations in Chinese science and technology communities, some relevant suggestions about future policy making in credit managements are raised.
Key words:   
收稿日期: 2017-10-18; 出版日期: 2018-09-15
基金资助:

科学基金依托单位信用评价的指标与方法研究

通讯作者: 肖小溪     E-mail: xiaoxiaoxi@casipm.ac.cn
引用本文:   
肖小溪 李晓轩. 科研项目承担单位信用内涵及形成机理研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(9): 1610-1614.
$author.xingMing_EN. Studies on Connotation and Mechanism of Organizational Credits for Research Program Performers: from the Perspective of Contractual Relationship[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(9): 1610-1614.
链接本文:  
http://159.226.25.137:81/Jweb_kxxyj/CN/
 
没有找到本文相关图表信息
没有本文参考文献
没有找到本文相关文献
版权所有 © 《科学学研究》编辑部 京ICP备05084193号-6
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司